mmmfilletofsoul: (Can you tell how I feel right now?)
Cheyenne ([personal profile] mmmfilletofsoul) wrote2011-05-16 09:48 pm

7th l o s t s o u l ~ [Voice]

[The last event left Cheyenne in a weird place and since then, she's been rather scarce around the village. Aside from getting food at one of the village restaurants, she's spent most of her time either in her apartment or in the forests just outside the village. Today, she's actually back to her usual spot: sitting on the edge of one of Luceti's many bridges, looking down at the water.]

[A few hours of this goes by until she finally opens her journal and poses a question to the residents. The very thing that's been on her mind all this time.]


It is not uncommon for others to ask questions using these journals, yes? [A pause. She wasn't really expecting an answer to that.]


...what do you think it means to be a "person"?
illusional: (Staring straight back at you.)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-17 05:07 am (UTC)(link)
By humane, would you mean to act as a human does?

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-17 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
Precisely. Someone can look human and be human, but if they do not act it then they are not human.
illusional: (Oh how shocking! [/sarcasm])

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-17 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
Then by your definition, if one is not acting human, they are not a person?

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-17 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. I don't consider myself to be even acquaintances with someone or something that cannot act civilized.

[She has no problems admitting this either.]
illusional: (Can you tell how I feel right now?)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-17 05:29 am (UTC)(link)
What of creatures that are not human? Do you believe they are incapable of becoming a person as well?

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-17 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
The only creatures I know that are not human, from my world, are Witches. They are incapable of being human in any way and only seek to take the lives of others. If someone can show me a creature capable of being a civilized being and a contributing member of society, then they are a 'person' in my eyes.
illusional: (Do you fear me?)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-17 05:35 am (UTC)(link)
I see.

However, there are many residents here in Luceti who are not human. You are speaking with one of them now.

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-17 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
I understand that. However, you are speaking and acting in a 'humane' way. So I consider you to be a person. Understand? In the same right, if a human in this place would not act in a 'humane' way, I would not consider them a 'person'.
illusional: (Innocent until proven guilty.)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-17 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
That is am interesting way of defining it. That even a human could not be a person... [She trails off for a moment.]

Would you extend this definition to a creature who, despite their best intentions, was dangerous?

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-17 05:52 am (UTC)(link)
There is being dangerous and there is acting out in a dangerous manner. So, which one do you refer to?
illusional: (I saw what you did there.)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-17 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose in this regard, I am referring to simply being dangerous.

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-17 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
People can be dangerous, but they choose to act out on that danger. To act out in a way that is not useful to society and creates a detriment is not being a 'person' in my eyes. [...] Everyone sees it different I guess.
illusional: (:|)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-17 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
That is what I am beginning to notice. I was not aware such a word could have so many definitions.

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-18 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but consider this. You do not need to conform to all definitions. Conform to the one most convenient for you to believe in. For me, it is the definition I have lived by my entire life.
illusional: (I saw what you did there.)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-18 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
The one most convenient... that does seem like the most ideal option, really. I've yet to see much consensus over which definition is best.

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-18 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Don't look for a consensus. You should decide what you want in the end. The opinions of others do not matter, unless you are attempting to conform to a norm.
illusional: (Can you tell how I feel right now?)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-18 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
And if I do not know what it is I want?

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-18 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Then you should think about it, now that people have given you ideas of what it means to be a person.
illusional: (Innocent until proven guilty.)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-18 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose that is the most logical course of action, isn't it.

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-19 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
Being logical is also a very important factor to being a person.

[At least for Homura. She doesn't associate with morons.]
illusional: (Can you tell how I feel right now?)

Re: voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-20 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
Is it? I would think reacting emotionally would be most likely associated with being a person.

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-20 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Emotions...[her thoughts drift to a certain emotionless being in her world, before coming back to the conversation.] Perhaps. But, emotions can be easily faked.
illusional: (Oh how shocking! [/sarcasm])

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-22 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
In that case, would it not mean they are not true emotions? And if they are not true emotions, they would not truly be acting emotionally.

After all, it is possible for a creature to look like a person without actually being a person.

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com 2011-05-22 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
Not always. Some creatures are incapable of emotion, but others choose to fake their own for whatever reason. [Like her, for example.] Still you are right. However, I do not judge by emotion, but by action. They speak stronger than words in the end.
illusional: (Can you tell how I feel right now?)

voice;

[personal profile] illusional 2011-05-22 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
...you are familiar with creatures that are incapable of emotion?

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com - 2011-05-22 19:56 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[personal profile] illusional - 2011-05-24 06:42 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com - 2011-05-24 20:36 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[personal profile] illusional - 2011-05-26 06:13 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com - 2011-05-26 08:06 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[personal profile] illusional - 2011-05-27 08:25 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com - 2011-05-27 08:39 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[personal profile] illusional - 2011-05-27 08:43 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com - 2011-05-27 08:51 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[personal profile] illusional - 2011-05-27 08:56 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com - 2011-05-27 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[personal profile] illusional - 2011-05-29 21:47 (UTC) - Expand

voice;

[identity profile] chronica.livejournal.com - 2011-05-29 23:19 (UTC) - Expand