[It's the definition she's always used as well. As a result, seeing some of the definitions that others have mentioned is a little strange to her. It does bring something else to mind for her, though - merely a small addendum to her initial explanation, but one that strikes her as worth noting.]
...The existence of non-humans identifiable as a "person" has been confirmed. [Both back in her own world and here, although she's admittedly referring more to the former with her statement.]
[Voice]
Date: 2011-05-19 09:50 pm (UTC)...The existence of non-humans identifiable as a "person" has been confirmed. [Both back in her own world and here, although she's admittedly referring more to the former with her statement.]