semper_cogitans: (D:>)
Robert Hastings ([personal profile] semper_cogitans) wrote in [personal profile] mmmfilletofsoul 2011-05-18 03:26 am (UTC)

[Voice]

[This is a situation that has never really come up for Robert. He ponders quietly for several long moments, and eventually has something of an awkward answer.]

Causing harm to survive...

In some ways, I suppose all creatures cause... some harm to something to survive. Barring open systems, all things need cycles to sustain themselves; to keep nutrients flowing, for example. Death must occur for life to occur, and vice-versa.

Yet... unnecessary suffering should always be reduced. That is the most ethical thing.

But in the case you outline - causing harm for means of survival - would... would it be considered necessary suffering?

I am not certain... Yet, when you describe that situation, the instigator of it still sounds like a person to me. Zie may not be the... most pleasant individual, but zie still fits the definition of "person"...

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting